« April 2024 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics
And is a spade a shovel?
ANTI-TERRORISM
BJP SHOULD THANK CONGRESS
Can you gainsay me?
Corrupt Indians
COST OF IMPUNITY
CUSTOMER RELATIONS
Debate competition
ECONOMICS
EDUCATING NONSENSE
Educative nonsense
Film Review
From the Washington Post
Incorrigible India
India and worse
INDIAN HYPOCRISY
INDIAN SEX
INDIANS HAVE MILES TO GO
INDO-PAK RELATIONS
INDO-US RELATIONS
Islamic terrorism
LEFT & LEFT OVERS
Money and honey
Movie Review
MPs earn disgustingly low
OWN CONVENIENCE PARAMOUNT
PAKISTAN'S DILEMMA  «
PATHETIC INDIA
POLITICS OF DANCING
POSER ON PATRIOTISM
RACISM
Real Estate Conundrum
RELIGION IN POLITICS
SECULARISM
SEX AND SENSIBILITIES
Sex, wine and women
SHARIAT LAW
Story of FM
TERRORISM
The pity of it all, Iago!
The politics of encounter
True Hindu
Truth we can never accept
Two billion more bourgeoi
UNPROFESSIONAL INDIANS
West Bengal's dilemma
Who wins who loses
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
WHAT IS WRONG WITH US?
Thursday, 13 January 2011
Has Pakistan become an impossible task?
Mood:  don't ask
Now Playing: Salman Taseer's death killed freedom
Topic: PAKISTAN'S DILEMMA
THE merciless killing of Governor of Pakistan’s Punjab province Salman Taseer did not come as a surprise just as he had himself said so on Twitter, almost on premonition in December 2010. The dastardly assassination of the high official reflects on several grave issues in Pakistan today. First, the security guard who killed him had been having a record of delinquency and was banned five months ago by a provincial police official from providing security to VIP personnel. Faisal Raza Abidi, special political adviser for Pakistan’s President told the media that the director inspector general of Punjab police had earlier barred Muhammad Mumtaz Qadri because of his extremist views, and it had been determined it was unsafe for him to guard important officials. Now the point that becomes moot, especially in a highly surcharged security enironment like Pakistan, is that how did Muhammad Mumtaz Qadri get a posting in the internal circle of security of an important person whose has been known for his straight talk on liberty and religion. 
 
Almost as predicted Muhammad Mumtaz Qadri killed Salman Taseer in broad daylight and leaving no chance for the Governor to survive the brutal attack. Most journalists who have been interacting with Taseer, including Christina Lamb, Sunday Times foreign correspondent and an unparalleled expert on Afghanistan and Pakistan, wrote about their exchanges with Taseer on various religious issues Pakistan is grappling with in the recent times. 

Intelligence agencies in Pakistan had warned officials in 2004 not to use Muhammad Mumtaz Qadri after they discovered connections between him and the religious group Dawat-e-Islami -- a Sunni group that claims it has a closer connection to Prophet Mohammed than other Muslims. The two main questions raised in international forums these days after the death of the governor of the Punjab province is that has religious zealots infiltrated the security systems in Pakistan quite irreversibly. Though India and Indian experts have always maintained that Pakistan as a country has been a moth-eaten state precisely because the power and influence of religion has been all-pervading to the extent that extremists have wide support base, the developments in recent history starting with the equally brutal killing of Wall Street Journal South Asian correspondent Daniel Pearl, have slowly made the West, and America in particular, see the truth as it is. 

Wikileaks by Julian Assange have confirmed America’s real understanding of the situation in South Asia and its master ploy to play along Pakistan to keep its interests secured -- all this even if President Barrack Obama’s officials in public forums talking about Pakistan’s ability to control the ever-increasing threat of religious extremism which will soon subsume the country, 
What would also come as a surprise for India is that the Western media is no more enamoured by the freedom struggle in Kashmir, which often resulted in tacit support for Pakistan in its coverage in the past. The American media has been recently making it amply clear that giving away Kashmir to Pakistan would only mean extending the extremism in Pakistan to the valley. The shut-up-or-be-shot-dead philosophy of the religious extremists which often gets correlated to terrorism all over the world, has found lesser and lesser takers in the West. The killing of the governor of Punjab province in Pakistan was about four Muslim women being served water by a Christian lady and the religious overtones of that snowballed into a major crisis and the arrest and death sentencing of the Christian lady Asia bibi. 

Governor Salman Taseer had spoken against the blasphemy law in Pakistan and its abrogation in keeping with modern, civilized tenets of legal system. His outspokenness attracted severe reproach from even the educated class in Pakistan. But the killing of the governor of Punjab province only proves that bringing back Pakistan from the brink will be an almost impossible task. Not even the West and the Americans believe that economic resurgence and inclusive growth can help matters.
 
**************** 

Posted by Anil Nair at 11:04 AM
Monday, 14 January 2008
Will Pakistan survive Benazir?s killing?
Mood:  accident prone
Now Playing: DIDN'T WE ALL PREDICT THIS TO HAPPEN?
Topic: PAKISTAN'S DILEMMA

When news trickled in at 6:50 pm on December 27 that Pakistani Opposition leader Benazir Bhutto is dead, there was disbelief and a sense of incredulity. Though GEO TV of Pakistan was the first in the media to declare her dead, everyone waited for the rumour to be squashed. The hope dissipated with every second passing until the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) spokesman announced her death standing outside the Rawalpindi general hospital trying hard to sound legible in the midst of overriding emotions.

If people in Pakistan as well as around the world had the wishful thinking that the news about her death would be proved wrong, they had good reasons for their concern. Benazir Bhutto was assassinated in a suicide attack just as she drove away from a campaign rally just minutes after addressing thousands of supporters. According to eye witnesses reports, she was travelling in a bullet-proof car but she had kept the window panes open to touch and shake hands with her supporters along the way. That proved fatal. The assailant first shot five bullets at her with a AK-57 rifle and then blew himself up near to the car.

Tragically, as it always happens at bomb blast sites, for a full ten minutes people did not come to the rescue of their leader from the car fearing another suicide bomb attack. She is reported to have died on the operation table at the hospital.

She was probably the most charismatic leader in Pakistani politics today, though she has never been relenting in her attacks on India and Kashmir. Over the years she had matured from her virulent speeches on army presence in Kashmir just as she was quiet on Pakistani occupation of Kashmir.

Her death has thrown the election campaign for the January 8 elections into chaos and even while going to press there were reports of mass protests and violence. Violence broke out in Lahore, Multan, Peshawar and several other parts of Pakistan. People burnt down banks, state-run grocery stores and private shops. Pakistan’s President Pervez Musharraf promptly blamed Islamic terrorists for the assassination. His words were brave: “This is the work of those terrorists with whom we are engaged in war”. But as Human Rights activist Asma Jehangir sorrowfully noted the culpability of Pakistan army in Bhutto’s killing itself is not far-fetched. The fact of the matter is that in Pakistan there is a thin line, often blurred, between local jehadi groups, army regulars and international terrorist outfits like Al Queda. The army can employ young boys from terrorist organisations to do its dirty job.

Bhutto’s death left a void at the top in her Pakistan People’s Party. US President George Bush’s anxiety at the fast developing events in Pakistan was not ün-noticeable. Speaking to reporters at his ranch in Crawford, Texas, a visibly worried Bush said that, “those who committed this crime must be brought to justice.”. Within an hour of the assassination President Musharraf convened an emergency meeting with his senior staff.

Benazir Bhutto, 54, served two terms as Prime Minister between 1988 and 1996. But in spite of her Kashmir agenda she spoke against militants’ overbearing grip in her country.

The most important question that confronts Pakistan today is: Should the elections be held? And if the elections are postponed what happens to the democratic process? Will the country sink into the quagmire of terrorism, religious fanaticism and anti-progress elements. Nawaz Sharif today is the lone Opposition leader and even he has suggested there is no point in holding elections when there is so much fear and threat to life. There are also experts who point out how Pakistan has survived worse crises, though democracy of any kind is too plaintive a system for a country that is ravaged by Islamic fanaticism. In the ultimate analysis, as Pandit Nehru had said: “It’s never the choice between the good and the evil. It’s always a choice between the evil and the lesser evil”. When it comes to Pakistan’s leaders it’s so true.

************

Posted by Anil Nair at 4:50 AM
Updated: Monday, 14 January 2008 5:04 AM

Newer | Latest | Older