« April 2024 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics
And is a spade a shovel?
ANTI-TERRORISM
BJP SHOULD THANK CONGRESS
Can you gainsay me?
Corrupt Indians
COST OF IMPUNITY
CUSTOMER RELATIONS
Debate competition
ECONOMICS
EDUCATING NONSENSE
Educative nonsense
Film Review
From the Washington Post
Incorrigible India
India and worse
INDIAN HYPOCRISY
INDIAN SEX
INDIANS HAVE MILES TO GO
INDO-PAK RELATIONS
INDO-US RELATIONS
Islamic terrorism
LEFT & LEFT OVERS
Money and honey  «
Movie Review
MPs earn disgustingly low
OWN CONVENIENCE PARAMOUNT
PAKISTAN'S DILEMMA
PATHETIC INDIA
POLITICS OF DANCING
POSER ON PATRIOTISM
RACISM
Real Estate Conundrum
RELIGION IN POLITICS
SECULARISM
SEX AND SENSIBILITIES
Sex, wine and women
SHARIAT LAW
Story of FM
TERRORISM
The pity of it all, Iago!
The politics of encounter
True Hindu
Truth we can never accept
Two billion more bourgeoi
UNPROFESSIONAL INDIANS
West Bengal's dilemma
Who wins who loses
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
WHAT IS WRONG WITH US?
Tuesday, 20 July 2010
Red Alert is green signal to development
Mood:  celebratory
Now Playing: Movie Review
Topic: Money and honey

MAOIST and Naxal killings are now coming closer to our cities, according to latest intelligence reports. And Bollywood is going into the hinterland to find out what went wrong in the villages for people to be carried away by the violence. It takes some guts to break the cast and take an opposite view, and that is what director Anant Mahadevan’s latest flick is all about. 

Red Alert, unlike most Bollywood movies, dares to take a violence-is-not-romantic thrust and is powerfully delivered. The characterisation of the protagonist played by Suniel Shetty, of an indigent villager trying to eke out an earning out of odd jobs is almost convincing, except for his gym-toned biceps. 

The movie’s final moments preserve the unpredictability, but the pro-development message is not lost on the viewers, even if it is targeted at the city audience. Wonder, how many people in Indian villages will get the chance or make the choice of watching the movie, but the idea seems to be about engaging the middle and upper middle class city-dwellers, who are so influential in government policy making. 

In the aftermath of Union Home Minister P Chidambaram’s open admission that he was not able to take appropriate action against Naxal violence for dissenting voices in his party, it is not clear if the film deliberately has taken a dig at the haphazard way the local police and Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) have been playing a cat and mouse game, often resulting in CRPF jawans getting killed in large numbers. 

But the extreme Left philosophy of violence, which is quite often misdirected at soft targets, is torn to smithereens. The corporate world has always been at the receiving end of the Left philosophy. 

Though the film does not go all out to defend rampant industrial development at the cost of the poor land-owners, the moral of the story that comes out loud is that wealth creation and distribution is the panacea for most societal ills. "Employment for the youth, State support for entrepreneurship and a peaceful lifestyle can wean away poor people from the treachery of Naxalism", says Vinod Khanna as a Naxalite-turned-entrepreneur. What the movie intends to do knowingly and inadvertently, is to propagate the idea of change, a change in the middle-class thinking.

****************

Posted by Anil Nair at 2:14 AM

Newer | Latest | Older