baby diary
« May 2024 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
EXCLUSIVE HINDUISM
FOR ALL THE OLDER BLOGS
GLOBAL WARMING
Islamic Terrorism
LANGUAGE PATROTISM
LATEST BLOGS
NOT CHAPPELL'S LOSS
SECULAR CAUSE
Y DON'T WE HAVE IT IN US
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
WE HAVE A LOT TO LEARN FROM THE WEST
Sunday, 6 May 2007
JeM becomes corporate entity
Now Playing: US State Dept finds India's anti-terrorist law enforcement outdated
Topic: Islamic Terrorism
The next time you see an irresistible festive offer on white goods at a mall, it could well be new products launched by Jaish-e-Mohammad. Or the flurry of building activity in your neighbourhood could be real estate development by the famed terrorist organisation. Only weeks ago National Security Advisor MK Narayanan told a disbelieving Munich conference that he had strong suspicion that the stock markets could be manipulated with terrorist organisations pumping in their ill-gotten wealth, even while playing bull and bear to increase return on investment.

Now the US State Department brings out a spine-chilling report to substantiate these claims. Commodities and real estate sectors are the prime targets for investments, according to the Country Terrorism Reports 2006. JeM has invested in other legal businesses also, like consumer goods manufacturing, the report adds. The strategy was made in anticipation of asset seizures by the Pakistan government, when JeM withdrew funds from bank accounts and invested them in legal businesses. JeM is funded by al Qaeda. The terrorist group is also involved in restaurant and shipping business. In the growing economy it is easier to make money and to divert it to jihadi activities.

Speaking about terrorism worldwide the report says the number of people killed in terror attacks has increased by over 40 per cent while attacks have increased by 28 per cent. This could only mean that death rate in each attack has gone up. Not surprisningly, 65 per cent of all deaths in terror attacks has been in Iraq. But it is revelation to suggest that 35 per cent of deaths occur outside Iraq when most of us always thought only Iraq is riddled with the daily death-dance of terrorism. Iran, according to the report, is the world's biggest sponsor of terrorism supporting extremist groups throughout West Asia and more particularly in Iraq.

The report does not say about Iran's involvement in terror in South Asia but that is anybody's guess. Terrorism based on religion knows no boundaries. Like recently, China trashed Pakistan's claim over closing terrorist camps, when it accused it of the same crime against humanity as India does quite often.

Another of our neighbours Afghanistan, where jihadi terrorism breeds uninterrupted by modern civilisation, also witnessed a large jump in attacks, according to the report. The worrying aspect is that, the report makes it amply clear that terrorist organisations like al Qaeda are adapting to the counter-terrorism mechanisms. Must that include proactive involvement to enter the equity markets to beat the financial embargo laid by the war-against-terror syndicate?

But beyond that primer on terrorism it is the report's overview of South and Central Asia which is essential reading for Indians. The report states matter-of-factly, "terrorists staged numerous attacks in India, including a series of commuter train bomb attacks in Mumbai which killed over 200 people and injured more than 700. Despite challenges associated with its law enforcement and judicial systems, India achieved major successes this year, including numerous arrests and confiscation of explosives and firearms". There was no mention, however, of the excruciatingly long time taken by the courts to dispense with final orders in the first serial bomb blasts case in Mumbai in which Sanjay Dutt is involved. But the no-holds-barred report tells almost that. Read this: "India's counter-terrorism efforts were hampered by its outdated and overburdened law enforcement and legal systems. The Indian court system was slow, laborious, and prone to corruption; terrorism trials can take years to complete. An independent Indian think-tank determined that the thousands of civilians killed by terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir from 1988 to 2002 received justice in only 13 convictions through December 2002; most of the convictions were for illegal border crossing or possession of weapons or explosives. Many of India's local police forces were poorly staffed, trained, and equipped to combat terrorism effectively".

On our other neighbour Bangladesh, the import of its statement should not be lost on anyone. Bangladesh, it said, continued to arrest extremists but the deteriorating political situation in that country may increase the opportunity for refuge or transit. That statement could well be applied to places in India as well. In Nepal and Sri Lanka terrorism carried out by the Maoists and LTTE posed serious challenge to the governments in power.

The most prominent terrorist groups were violent extremist groups in Jammu and Kashmir; Maoists operating in the Naxalite belt in eastern, southern and central India and ethno-linguistic nationalists in the north-eastern states, according to the US State Department report.

But the most instructive part of the report is about how minorityism has shown its link to terrorism. The report says, India alleged, based on numerous arrests and several attacks, that the UN designated Foreign Terrorist Organisations (Jaish-e-Mohammad and Lashkar-e-Taiba) began a campaign in the Indian heartland to gain support from India's minority Muslim population for terrorist attacks. The Indian government, it added for good measure blamed the two prominent terrorist organisations based in Pakistan for several attacks in major Indian cities. Does that mean that the terrorist organisations in Pakistan are getting support from Muslims by raking up minorityism, is again, anybody's guess.

Recounting the major terror attacks in India the report says, on July 11 terrorists set off seven blasts on packed commuter trains in Mumbai killing at least 200 people and injuring more than 700. On March 7 terrorists set off three blasts in the holy city of Varanasi killing 21 and injuring 62 people. Without mincing words the report says, on September 9 terrorists set off a series of blasts outside a Mosque in the western city of Malegaon that killed 38 people and wounded more than 50. Police found that Malegaon attack was perpetrated by Islamic extremists hoping to invite further anger between Hindu and Muslim communities.

Dwelling further on the terror attacks in India the report says, on October 27, Karnataka state police in Mysore arrested two suspected terrorists who allegedly belonged to the terrorist group Al-Badr. "Police believed the suspects were inserted as an advance team to establish a base in southern India from which they would facilitate terrorist attacks on economic and government targets, especially in nearby Bangalore, a high-tech hub". This only confirms worst fears over the ambitions of terrorist organisations. They can subvert the system to enter legitimate business as well as threaten existing ones. Will Bangalore become another Bollywood?

On the othe hand, the July 11 terrorist attack in Srinagar that killed eight tourists and injured 43 in Srinagar was "designed to inhibit growth in the tourism industry and to hamper increasing Kashmiri enthusiasm for normalization of ties between India and Pakistan".

On Naxal terrorism, which has subsumed large swathes of eastern, central and southern India, the report says that naxalites grew in sophistication and lethality. Naxalites launched several high-level attacks, raising the insurgency's profile, and expanded the rural territory under their control.

All the same, the report even gives credence to several police investigations in all terrorism-related cases. "Despite these challenges, India scored major successes this year, including numerous arrests and the seizure of explosives and firearms during operations against Lashkar-e-Taiba and other terrorist groups". But don't be surprised if tomorrow jihadi terrorist organisations float a pension fund of their own in the stock markets. That is, if they haven't already.

********

Posted by Anil Nair at 6:51 PM
Post Comment | Permalink
Saturday, 21 April 2007
FOR NEWER INSIGHTFUL ANALYSES PLEASE VISIT MY NEW BLOG SITE
Now Playing: FOR NEWER INSIGHTFUL ANALYSES PLEASE VISIT MY NEW BLOG SITE
Topic: LATEST BLOGS
This is the last of the blogs in this section. For newer blogs please click here: https://changingindia.tripod.com/Changing-India/

Posted by Anil Nair at 7:56 PM
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 19 April 2007
YESUDAS AND BISMILLAH KHAN
Mood:  don't ask
Now Playing: Why non-Hindus should not be allowed to enter temples
Topic: EXCLUSIVE HINDUISM
Today an old friend of mine in Bollywood send me a message asking me why Hindus in God's own country are so fanatic about not opening temples to people from other religions. Well, I would say they are not far wrong in being steadfast in their demand. To understand the issue we should first understand Hinduism.

Hinduism is not expansionist like other popular religions. The most notable amongst such religions are Christianity and Islam. Both started off with the idea of expanding its cult, and made no bones of the fact that the sword was the best way to increase the count. There is no such prophet in Hinduism.

Although Christianity has toned down a lot because that religion thrives in the western world where people are exceedingly mature and sophisticated, Islam still unambiguously and proudly goes by the sword. Both religions propagate the idea that their own god is the only true god while the rest are fake. The holy trinity is all about that. Of Islam, one has to read Arun Shourie's books to realise how crude, cruel and intolerable is Islam. His books are also demonstrative of the Christian missionaries and their conspiracies.

To understand why Hinduism is not inclusive, one has to understand the genesis of this religion. Hinduism belongs to an era which is at  best estimated and at worst, relegated. No one yet knows the exact time period when Hinduism was born. By all estimates, it was not born at one instance when someone sat down to write the holy edicts. It was in all probability evolved by several thousands of generations of extremely intelligent upper caste people who had an incredible insight into rights and wrongs -- not just morals but even about what is sustainable and what is healthy, with no science or technology to aid them.

As Gandhiji once said it is easy to damn Hinduism in today's terms, from today's modern way of life, but it is difficult to find fault if you put it perspective. Hinduism does not belong to this age but it was an impeccable way of life in the past centuries and millennia. Everything about Hinduism, its caste system, treatment of women, culture, dance, music, et al fell perfectly in place.

Hinduism was also prevalent during a time when there were no other religions. And most importantly, there was no marauding religion that would force Hindus to other faiths of a better god. That is the reason for Hinduism's insipid reaction to the Christian missionaries and Islamic jihad. Hinduism simply does not know how to combat conversion.

Yet again, one should understand that Hinduism was more a stringent way of life with no place for gods. Have you by any chance read about any gods in the vedas other that Indradev? If you go through various edicts of Hinduism, be it Ayurveda, music, rituals at home and in society, you will realise the main aim was to bring discipline in people so that the society is manageable. It may not look fair in today's western way of life. But it was most close to nature and the best system in the prevailing circumstances. I always wondered why the environmentalists and wildlife enthusiasts never rooted for Hinduism. It even made gods out plants and animals.

Hinduism is the only religion in the world which gives space to a non-believer. You don't have to believe in god or regularly visit temples to be a Hindu, or read the scriptures. If you are born a Hindu you remain a Hindu. If the vedas don't mention gods it is obvious that gods in Hinduism came much later, only to bring some kind of societal discipline. If people don't follow rituals which bring that discipline you wil invite the wrath of various gods. That's how it is. Now tell me, if Hinduism is such, where is the place for people from other religions coming into the Hindu fold?!

Just as a postscript I should add that the case of Yesudas is being brought into this only to gain some brownie points. Look at what Yesudas has said about Hinduism. He is probably the biggest proponent of Carnatic music today. He has made it very clear right in the beginning of his career that to be a Carnatic singer you need to be Hindu. Because music is taught in temples in south India. You have to bow before the lord, bow before your guru and sing peaens to Hindu gods in Carnatic music. God and Hindu rituals are part of the Carnatic music. Will a follower of Christianity who is told every Sunday that the holy trinity is beyond debate learn Carnatic music? Or will a Muslim who reads five times a day the indisputable fact that all kafirs have to be brought under the sword or be converted, which incidentally includes circumcision, be able to bow before Sarsawati.

Bharat Ratna Ustad Bismillah Khan, India's best ever shehnai player spent all his life in Varanasi amongst the temples, though he was never allowed to enter them. He admittedly sat outside, touched the stone carvings and murals and got inspiration for his music. Cavil was not in his making. He prayed and sang praises of Saraswati all his life.

But Yesudas and Khan were both not born Hindu and hence cannot enter a temple. Just as lower caste people were kept out of Brahminical temples. Temples of lower castes and Dalit Hindus abound the rural landscape. So the point is that even an apostate Hindu, a non-believer can enter temples because he is born Hindu but people who are not born Hindu  are barred. Now it is up to us to decide if we want to demolish that edict also, just as we have done with thousands of other Hindu holy edicts. Amen.

Posted by Anil Nair at 10:48 PM
Updated: Thursday, 19 April 2007 11:00 PM
Post Comment | Permalink
Sunday, 8 April 2007
SOCIALISM
Mood:  don't ask
Now Playing: SOCIALISM IS THE CAUSE OF ALL ILLS IN INDIA
Topic: Y DON'T WE HAVE IT IN US
All through my life I have hated Pandit Nehru for his political philosophy as much as his leanings towards the British. His political leanings still leave me cold as it is the foremost reason for India's deprivity as much as the cause of almost all problems, from terrorism to poverty.

But it is his leanings towards the Brits that I am now beholden to. I will explain why Pandit Nehru, or rather his philosophy was so hypocritical.

Often when I travel by crowded trains I am witness to the most ugly brawls. Sometimes it even ends in fisticuffs. Lot of four-letter words flying around. All leading to unnecessary stress. I am not suggesting that we should be calm and peaceful. Rather it is our peace and quietitude that has exacerbated our problems to points of no return. But if you notice it is always on day to day small non-issues that we get hot under the collar. We are ready to beat anyone up if he even inadvertently hurts our ego. But what about the 50 years of Pakistani terrorism which still kills our people in hundreds. Where does all our celebrated, gung ho self esteem disappear?!

Why do we have this irrepressible urge to find soft targets? We all know for sure that crowded trains are caused by mismanagement. Lately, with just very little efforts Laloo Yadav has been able to turn the railways into a profit-making PSU. So think what a hard-nosed private company like Reliance or Kumaramangalam Birla would do to railways if it were privatised.

Better still, give each zone to a couple of private companies, like in telecom sector, or like in the UK and see what competition will do to our railway system. And being the undisputed leader in IT we could be having the best railway network in the world, every which way you look -- swanky carriages,  timely service, safety, speed and comfort!

But no, we would have none of that. We voted out Arun Shourie's party from power because he transparently privatised PSUs. I have even heard my stock market-savvy Christian friends vociferously maintaining that Arun Shourie's policies will only bring misery. And I suspect it is secularism talking there. Modi would meet the same fate. If Laloo had done all that my secular friends would have cheered. And there in lies our immaturity and lack of sophistication.

But never mind the secularists, they don't matter in the number game of Indian democracy. It is the common people who have to travel in 19th century coaches who should know better than to oppose Shourie. I have seen people nudging railway personnel to snap up their act at the ticket counter. Why doesn't the everyday train traveller realise that the solution to all this misery is privatisation. And in today's world of the demand parrying supply in human resources the people who get laid off by privatisation would anyway get better jobs. But that is begging the question. In all the cases of privatisation of PSUs the number of employees has only trebled, leave apart lay-offs.

In every case of PSU disinvestment, the companies have been loss-making because of mismanagement or because of indifference of top echlons. In either situations privatisation has remarkably changed the situation where everyone is in a win-win situation -- be it the employees, the government or the customers. I fail to understand why even the media does not seem to want to highlight this ostensible truth. In this she of 10+ per cent growth every company is in crying need for expansions. So where is the question of lay-offs.

But even today, we will only vote for the sick socialism that has stifled our economic growth to the Hindu rate. Even today we will not support Dr Manmohan Singh in his plans to liberalise the economy. We are so stupid to still support a failed system like socialism which has failed the world over.

And it is not that we haven't seen successful economies. Almost all Bollywood films are shot in developed countries these days in the name of cross-over films. Hollywood films are shown in theaters as well as TV channels dubbed in Hindi. All these movies show the swanky, plush developed countries in all their splendour. Yet we, the immature Indian, refuse to learn lessons.

Posted by Anil Nair at 7:04 AM
Post Comment | Permalink
Saturday, 7 April 2007
SO OBVIOUS REASONS
Mood:  d'oh
Now Playing: INDIA, CHINA RESPONSIBLE FOR UNUSUAL SUMMER HEAT
Topic: GLOBAL WARMING
So everyone in India today is talking about global warming. Every year the weather has been becoming more and more extreme, be it summer heat or flooding during monsoon or even winter cold and snow. My cousin recently wrote to me from the US about how the snow in the just passed winter was a record high.

My friends in Kerala call up to say that tropical regions are becoming uninhabitable because of intense heat. People have even died this summer due to sun-burn in Kerala though Indians are amongst the most sturdy people in the world.

For the first time, Mumbai saw torrential rains two years ago that sunk the city. Now has it ever occurred to you that the climatic changes are taking place because of the progress of man. It is because of science and technology, the lifestyle changes which include driving cars, owning fridges, TVs, homes, shopping at malls, etc. First let me give you a backgrounder before pointing out who is responsible.

Mark Tully's first book on India is now becoming prophetic. In his book 'No full stops in India' Tully had explained that the western concepts can never be extended to countries like India when gauging the national progress and
development. If every Indian family owns a car, a television, a
refrigerator, etc. will the planet have enough resources left? Think about it. We are a billion people.

In a seminar on real estate in Mumbai last year an official from Wipro had raised the same point about sustainable growth, what with so many malls, expressways, new cars, all coming up across the country. If 250-million people or 25-crore families own cars will there be any fuel left on this
planet, and will we have enough roads to ply them on? What will be the consequences of emissions from such large number of vehicles on climate change. We already know.

The latest report from the UN on climate change brings forth this long-held conventional thinking that Gandhi's philosophy of there-is-enough-for-everyone's-need-but-not-for-everyone -greed and Hinduism holds true. Global warming has been brought about by the second global phase of high economic growth in India and China. Not that the developed countries
are paragons of virtue. Their development had started the first phase of global warming, which according to foreign media made the situation ''beyond the tipping point''.

Even in remote villages of India global warming has led to devastating consequences.
Wells which had perennially borne water for centuries ran dry. And the same wells have filled up to the brim during the recent years' heavy rains which shook the foundation of the surrounding houses. Both have been considered as bad omen by villagers. Indian farmers have instinctive knowledge of the weather and prospects of harvesting, but their instincts don't prove right anymore as the climate has changed beyond repair.

The latest UN report is as alarming as it gets. Global food grain production is estimated to slump by over 30 per cent. There were reports of how the developed countries will spend billions of dollars to combat the adverse
effects of global warming. But the developing nations will bear the cross as they don't have the resources or the technology to check and deal with global warming.

The UN has estimated that over 132-million people will starve to death as prices of food grain and pulses would skyrocket. And if the response of the governments to deal with disasters in India is anything to go by, one can
rest assured that millions who die will have no recourse to any state
assistance to deal with massive and unprecedented famine. The moral of the story is that development and progress of countries as huge as India and
China have to be sustainable.

Even today few people outside the ambit of environmental activism understand the gravity of global warming and polar ice melting. It is not just about sea levels increasing and submerging huge tracts of land but also about
agriculture failing, slump in marine production, drought and famine,
diseases, misery and death for most of mankind.

There are even reports that only 500-million people will survive the
devastation wrought by global warming. It does not take much to guess which countries will finally survive.

But industrialisation of various countries has been taking place for over a century, but why this sudden markedly change in the climate? There is an underlying reason for which China and India are wholly responsible.

When the western world or even Japan and Singapore went in for massive industrialisation and development projects like buildings, ports, roads and malls; and had also bought cars and refrigerators for every family it did not make as much an impact on the environment. Why? Even when a country as large as the US developed to become a role-model for the rest of the world, it did not make as huge an impact on the environment as India and China are doing now.

The answer lies in the population of these two countries. A lot of people say that every country goes through the same process, almost to the detail, like the painful inflation and interest rate hikes.

Why we Indians should consider ourselves responsible for this lethal situation is that we had an opportunity to build India into a developed country just as the US,  without causing so much damage to the environment. Our development process has not even started today, with almost all the parameters of a developed nation status yet to be fulfilled. But already our progress is creating an environmental havoc. If we had after gaining Indepedence in 1947 immediately got into liberalising our economy as we are doing today our country would have developed like Singapore. Singapore got Independence from British rule as late as 1965 yet look at where it has reached and where are we today? Singapore is a role-model for even other developed countries when it comes infrastructure and law and order.

Our population was about 25-crore at the time of Independence. We, out of our immaturity and lack of sophistication, got sold to Nehruvian socialism. Don't blame Pandit Nehru for the mess. If we had voted against socialism, knowing as all intelligent people do that socialism is not the way to develop a nation into modernity,
We could become a developed nation like any G7 country today without costing this planet its life. Just as Mark Tully said in his book. With a 25-crore population it is possible to progress into a developed country without any pain that we are going through everyday. Look at the minorityism and the reservation policy of this government and people tell me they are dreaded.

But more than even that, is the fact that the intelligent people who are in terrible minority in this country feel our policies are laughably naïve, crude and  immature. Reservation policy and minorityism are not our only failings. Democracy is such a beautiful system of governance but we simply don't have the maturity and sophistication for it. And now the whole world is paying for it. Last year when crude prices went up to $80 per barrel president Bush blamed India and China for it. Very soon the rest of the world will blame us for global warming and all its disastrous effects. And they won't be far wrong.
______________________

What does all this mean

# All over the world agriculture harvest will slump by nearly 10 per cent by
2020, and in all probability up to 30 per cent by 2050

# Crop yields to drop, and consequently prices of foodgrain, pulses and
seafood are expected to surge beyond common man's reach

# Himalayan glaciers to melt threatening 700-million people. If one goes by
the current rate of melting the glaciers will disappear by 2035

# The present trend of decline in grain harvests, chronic flooding, heat
waves and droughts to become worse

# A 2-degree Celcius rise in temperature will plunge rice harvest in China
by 30 per cent

# Sea water temperature rise to affect marine production which is yet to be
estimated.

# Global wheat, corn and barley production to be down by 40-million tones

# More than 200-million people to be displaced because of rising sea-level
and submersion

# Mediterranean region to become arid and to lose capacity to yield any
farming produce

# Destruction to be worst seen in sub-Saharan and Asian regions

Posted by Anil Nair at 9:34 PM
Updated: Saturday, 7 April 2007 9:36 PM
Post Comment | Permalink
GREG CHAPPELL SHOULD LEARN TO STAY AWAY FROM INDIA
Mood:  crushed out
Now Playing: Indians will kill India the same way our players killed the game for us
Topic: NOT CHAPPELL'S LOSS
I sincerely feel sorry for the Indian cricket coach Greg Chappell. He should have never taken up this job of training an Indian team. Look at the Pakistani coach. Poor hit paid with his life. I am so surprised why the media is not fingers at the team. Or is it communal to make any allegations against the Pakistani team.

I cannot help but wonder why the media which shows all the gumption to make wild charges against Narendra Modi, even publish some page 3 macho man saying he will kill Modi if gets a gun, maintains this unseemly decency when it comes to Woolmer's death. Not that people on the street are making their own conclusions.

I have now stopped listening intently to the vox populi intently about Pakistani treachery when I travel by train or bus. People are very less magnanimous when it comes to accusations on the Pakistani team or what they feel about Sachin Tendulkar and his mates.

But having said all that I also feel the Indian cricket team epitomises us Indians when it comes to rudeness, superciliousness, arrogance, unprofessionalism and the incapacity to work towards a larger goal.

Our cricket team is also representative of the state of our country. We Indians are possibly the best in the world when it comes to self promotion and getting our place in the sun on a personal level. We are the most competitive in the world. We take pride in saying we are ingenious in breaking the rule, the law, evading taxes and everything unsavoury. But when it comes to running the country we are world's most pathetic people.

We don't realise if we should vote for Modi, Laloo, Arun Shourie, Dr Manmohan Singh, Chandra Babu Naidu, Yeshwant Sinha, AK Anthony and the likes for their economic agenda. Put your hand on your heart and say you would? I will bet my life you will not. Pray why? Ask Greg Chappell!

Posted by Anil Nair at 9:27 PM
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, 6 April 2007
SEX SELLS
Mood:  cool
Now Playing: How do animals copulate without sex education?
Topic: SECULAR CAUSE

Sex education has again come centrestage as anything related to sex can be, after the very secular Union minister for human resources Arjun Singh made sex education mandatory for school children. Nevermind his ministerial colleague Priya Ranjandas Munshi banning FTV and HBO for showing vulgarity, whatever that means.

There is so much of confusion created by people on both sides of the fence; and the 'manufactured' confusion and outrage is deliberate. The idea is to obfuscate the issue when you cannot win the argument.

Let me explain. In the midst of this raging controversy are reports of youngsters embarrassing residents of Band Stand, Mumbai by their public display of passion. Police rounded up nearly 180 college going couples for lip locking in public. Well, to be fair that can seriously embarrass people who are not used to it. I once had faced such an incredulous situation when watching TV at a friend's house. A couple during courtship were shown passionately kissing in a Sunday movie on TV. My friend's father watching the movie along with us turned his face in embarrassment.

Though the incident was not lost on me I realised that one man's food is another man's poison. Then, when I started my career with a youth magazine in 1991 I had another edifying experience. I was making the agony uncle's column where a Bollywood star was replying to youngsters' sex problems.

When a teenage guy wrote in asking the star how should he be  prepared for his first sexual intercourse, the star replied matter-of-factly: "you don't have to read any manual for having sex, you have to do what comes naturally to you." is the star trying to suggest there is no need for sex education? Or does it mean that all this hangama over sex education is only to titilate young minds to have unbridled sex?

As someone said, do animals have any sex education? How do they procreate so successfully?

Again, in the middle of these reports sexual, there is a front page anchor report in the Times of India that four 12-year boys  coupled with their classmates to have an orgy in the 15 minute recess in school in full view of their classmates. And instead of giving them advice on protected sex as so many in Indian media would suggest the American school arrested them and put them in juvenile jail! This happened in the US if I have not mentioned that to you. So what went wrong in the mecca of sex education?!

Finally, I have a poser for all those people who want to ban sex and violence on TV. Ban Discovery and National Geographic channels first because every time I put it on I only see animals killing each or copulating with each other. Also, all those people for ethical treatment for animals should first stop those carnivorous animals killing innocent, defenceless smaller animals. I have seen a lion tearing open a deer after a hot chase and the camera  even caught the pumping heart of the poor animal as the lion prised  open its torso. And also, I find it extremely embarrassing to watch huge animals, all hung, mounting on the female for a passion filled sex while my son asks me innocently: "this is how I mount on you every morning in bed to wake you up." I give him no sex education.

************


Posted by Anil Nair at 10:07 PM
Post Comment | Permalink
SON OF THE SOILED
Mood:  chillin'
Now Playing: Why Marathi Manus sounds like parochialism
Topic: LANGUAGE PATROTISM

So we have both Thackarey cousins wooing the sons of the soul. Few call them Maharashtrians as that would fail the cause. After all, such a racist cause has to be  legitimised. I always wondered why it is so difficult to call a spade a spade. But recently it dawned on me that it is difficult for even the media at least in Mumbai to do so because there are so many Maharashtrians amongst their own that it is difficult not to legitimise the cause.

Unlike the Hindutva cause where the majority of the English reading people would forsake militant Hinduism, the fight for 'Mumbai for Maharashtrians' has many takers amongst the Maharashtrian community.

When Raj Thackarey's boys beat up Bihari boys who came to Mumbai to take railway board tests for job I had thought it was the fringe community which supported the cause. I was stunned to read the next day's headlines where the Congress chief minister Sushil Kumar Shinde, a dalit by caste, unwaveringly supported the cause. His only rider was that he was against the violence!

The hypocrisy in this son-of-the-soil policy is that when Jade Goody called Shilpa Shetty a dog staying in slums we all got outraged. What about non-Maharashtrians being abused, beaten up and ostracised?

**************


Posted by Anil Nair at 9:52 PM
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older