« August 2007 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
And is a spade a shovel?
ANTI-TERRORISM
BJP SHOULD THANK CONGRESS
Can you gainsay me?
Corrupt Indians
COST OF IMPUNITY
CUSTOMER RELATIONS
Debate competition
ECONOMICS
EDUCATING NONSENSE
Educative nonsense
Film Review
From the Washington Post
Incorrigible India
India and worse
INDIAN HYPOCRISY
INDIAN SEX
INDIANS HAVE MILES TO GO
INDO-PAK RELATIONS
INDO-US RELATIONS
Islamic terrorism
LEFT & LEFT OVERS
Money and honey
Movie Review
MPs earn disgustingly low
OWN CONVENIENCE PARAMOUNT
PAKISTAN'S DILEMMA
PATHETIC INDIA
POLITICS OF DANCING
POSER ON PATRIOTISM
RACISM
Real Estate Conundrum
RELIGION IN POLITICS
SECULARISM
SEX AND SENSIBILITIES
Sex, wine and women
SHARIAT LAW
Story of FM
TERRORISM
The pity of it all, Iago!
The politics of encounter
True Hindu
Truth we can never accept
Two billion more bourgeoi
UNPROFESSIONAL INDIANS
West Bengal's dilemma
Who wins who loses
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
WHAT IS WRONG WITH US?
Saturday, 25 August 2007
NEW LIGHT ON GANDHI
Mood:  special
Now Playing: Mahatma with an estranged son
Topic: True Hindu

Few movies can recreate historical characters without a tinge of colour — it usually depends on which side of the divide are the film-makers. Gandhi, My Father, written and directed by Feroz Abbas Khan, is brilliant in telling a story. The under-lying theme of the movie is to show the tumultuous relationship Gandhiji had with his eldest son Harilal. Gandhiji has been a darling of the people and his philosophy of non-violence has endeared freedom fighters all over the world. Nelson Mandela had once attributed his success to Gandhian way of struggle to free South Africa from apartheid.

But Feroz Abbas Khan’s movie deals exclusively with Gandhiji’s personal relation with Harilal. Gandhiji refuses to educate his children or send Harilal to England to study law. Gandhiji ostensibly wanted his son to join him in the political movement to gain India’s Independence. Feroz Abbas Khan has to be credited for handling the sensitive subject so fairly that at the end of the movie it becomes difficult to take sides. You wouldn’t really blame Gandhiji for Harilal’s travails.

Gandhi, My Father is such a departure from the mainstream popular movies. Especially so because Hindi film industry has the propensity to take positions that can distort reality. The intention might be to take cinematic liberties to convince a largely ignorant people who don’t know the other side of the story. But as often seen the attempt might reek of immaturity and crudity. Like it happened with Sanjay Dutt starrer Lage Raho Munnabhai. Just to appeal to the yuppie crowd Munnabhai made a travesty of Gandhism.

For any follower of Gandhiji the brazenly told falsehood is hard to watch. The director of Munnabhai had once said that the movie was an attempt to make Gandhiji’s philosophy interesting to today’s generation! But just take one aspect of the Munnabhai—Mahatma. Gandhiji was a big proponent of sexual abstinence. The movie showed the Mahatma actually helping Munnabhai court a girl, take her in a ‘kissing car’ and take sex to logical conclusion. Mahatma Gandhi is known to have given up sex at the age of 40 and even kept away from physical relations with his wife. Can’t believe how can a Sanjay Dutt who is nearly 50 years of age get the Mahatma’s support in such licentiousness. That movie was made with the sole intention of saving Sanjay Dutt in the bomb blast case by peddling distorted version of Gandhism called Gandhigiri. The halo around Sanjay Dutt’s head failed to stick.

Producer of Gandhi, My Father Anil Kapoor does not seem to have any such agendas. Harilal Gandhi in the movie is shown at several places to be gullible enough to fail in business, crooked enough to swindle people and even convert to Islam when Muslim zealots try to make use of his rift with his father. Finally, Harilal comes back to Hinduism when his mother makes him see light.

The film poster explains vividly that: To people he (Gandhiji) was a father; To his son he was a father he never had! Akshaye Khanna, who plays Harilal Gandhi, is good in some situations but his inexperience shows at others. He does not come up to the brilliance of Saif Ali Khan in Omkara or Irfan Khan in Maqbool. But the rest of the team such as Bhumika Chawla as Harilal’s wife Gulab Gandhi, Shefali Chhaya as Kasturba Gandhi, Daniel Janks as Henry Polak all do wonderfully well in the period film situations. But as the focus is on Darshan Jariwala as Mahatma Gandhi and Akshaye Khanna as Harilal, the rest of the cast pale into insignificance. The cinematography by David Macdonald is unusually good for shots which bring out silhouettes with palpable feelings—like the scene in which Gandhiji, counsels his son under a tree with the setting sun behind. The same scene reoccurs quite a few times and the viewer starts to understand the widening gap between the protagonist and the Mahatma. The only setback is the projection of the Mahatma as a family man. It would have been good if Gandhiji had been shown having a hands-on involvement in the freedom struggle which had decidedly changed his priorities in life. At the end Gandhiji poignantly states: “The greatest regret of my life…two people I could never convince — my Muslim friend Mohammed Ali Jinnah and my own son Harilal Gandhi.” Mahatma will remain mahatma.



Posted by Anil Nair at 12:30 PM
Sunday, 29 July 2007
PM is right when he says CEOs' salaries have to be rationalised
Mood:  suave
Now Playing: EXCUSE ME, I AM WITH THE PM ON THIS!
Topic: MPs earn disgustingly low
Recently I received a mail from a close friend trying to raise a stink over the prime minister's statement to rationalise CEOs' salaries in this country. Read my reply at the end of this copy.

 

Have a look at this

Salary & Govt. Concessions for a Member of Parliament (MP)


Monthly Salary
: 12,000

Expense for Constitution per month
: 10,000

Office expenditure per month
: 14,000

Traveling concession (Rs. 8 per km)
: 48,000 ( eg.For a visit from kerala to Delhi & return: 6000 km)

Daily DA TA during parliament meets
: 500/day


Charge for 1 class (A/C) in train:
Free (For any number of times)
(All over India
)


Charge for Business Class in flights
: Free for 40 trips / year (With wife or P.A.)


Rent for MP hostel at Delhi
: Free


Electricity
costs at home : Free up to 50,000 units


Local phone call charge
: Free up to 1 ,70,000 calls.


TOTAL expense for a MP [having no qualification] per year
: 32,00,000 [i.e. 2.66 lakh/month]


TOTAL expense for 5 years
: 1,60,00,000

For 534 MPs, the expense for 5 years :

8,54,40,00,000 (nearly 855 crores)


AND THE PRIME MINISTER IS ASKING THE HIGHLY QUALIFIED, OUT PERFORMING CEOs TO CUT DOWN THEIR SALARIES.....


This is how all our tax money is been swallowed and price hike on our regular commodities.......

And this is the present condition of our country:

The image

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/85000/images/_89378_india_poverty_child_by_river_300.jpg

http://weblogs.nrc.nl/weblog/wereld/wp-content/uploads/indian_poor.jpg

855 crores could make their life livable !!
Think of the great democracy we have.............

PLEASE FORWARD THIS MESSAGE TO ALL REAL CITIZENS OF INDIA
..
but,

STILL Proud to be INDIAN

 

i know hitting a delete button is easier.......bt.......try 2 press  fwd  button 2 make people aware of it!

 

Frankly my friends, I don't understand what is this ruckus about? The prime minister only said that the CEOs’ salaries have to be rational. Which no one can deny. The CEOs and the top echelons of a private sector company enjoy perks and salary as if it is nobody’s business. The highest annual salary paid in this country to CEOs is in the vicinity of $8-million in cash, that’s a cool Rs32-crore per year (Rs2.6-crore a month!). It’s quite propagandist to send pictures showing people standing in the queue at ration shops. Do you see any of the CEOs there? Probably they are queuing up at the SUV showroom. And the perks for CEOs are unaccountable… private jets, five-star hotel stay, holidaying in Switzerland and what have you. The MPs are the CEOs of this country. If for managing a company you get Rs2.6-crore a month, can you imagine how much should the salary of the CEO of this country be? And to say MPs are illiterates and hence should be not paid high sums is like saying all illiterate entrepreneurs like Dhirubhai Ambani should have been stripped of their wealth as they were uneducated. No one is barring educated people from joining politics and going to Lok Sabha to earn a Rs1-lakh salary + perks.

Rather I would join a campaign which says every employee of a successful company should get equal share in profits and hence salaries in corporates should be rationalized. A watchmen or a peon cannot get a Rs15,000 salary while the CEO gets a Rs2.6-crore salary. So kindly pass on this mail to as many friends you have. It is just a matter of natural justice!

Cheers!

Anil Nair
 


Posted by Anil Nair at 1:29 PM
Tuesday, 24 July 2007
Is unbridled sex, every which way, really as good as we are told?
Mood:  surprised
Now Playing: WHY DOES THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PICTURE DIFFICULT TO SEE?
What struck me as incontrovertible evidence against unbridled sex is the fact that all religions consider sex to be dirty, highly objectionable act. Even Mahatma. Gandhi was a big proponent of abstinence from sex. That became a butt of intemperate jokes for many, and even mainstream movies have made fun of Gandhi on that issue. Which is actually sad, as Gandhi had made it clear that abstinence can give you the power of control on your emotions. Wonder, how many tried it if his philosophy was true before damning the Mahatma.

That is also why the movie Lage Raho Munnabhai was a travesty of truth. The movie showed the Mahatma actually helping Munnabhai court a girl, take her in a 'kissing car' and take sex to logical conclusion. The grandson of the Mahatma who otherwise gets hyper over misrepresentation of Gandhian philosophy kept silent. Or else, the underworld friends of Sanjay Dutt would have did him in. So much for Gandhigiri.

Mahatma Gandhi is known to have given up sex at the age of 40 and even kept away from his wife. Can't believe how can a Sanjay Dutt who is over 50 years get the Mahatma's support in such licentiousness. The way we Indians prove our stupidity is hardly believeable.

One holy book which explicitly restrains its followers from sexual misdemeanours is the Holy Koran. It has said that people are not supposed to even look at the toes of a girl as males can get sexually aroused by that. Second, Islam explicitly states you are not supposed to watch your sex partners private parts even while having sex. The couple should have sex only on the bed and not in the barn, the kitchen, the bathroom or the basement. And fourth,  sex should be only at midnight and not during any other hour of the day. Don't you think the intention is to curb not just sex but even control sexual activity between married couples?

When it comes to Hinduism, secularists would quote the Kamasutra and the Kajoraho caves to prove that Hindus should never talk about morality. I could never understand from when on the caves or Vatsyayana's ramblings became religious texts. I have never seen Kamasutra being qouted during poojas or Hindu ceremonies. Nor have I ever seen pictures of godess Sarsawati in the nude as a mark of sexuality. The murals in Kajoraho caves are only sexual postures and by no measure represents gods in coital position.

And now we have a raging controversy over a Sikh sect called Dera offending the Sikhs. The issue is that the Dera chief wore the dress of Guru Gobind Singh, the original historical leader of Sikhism. He also was shown on TV as making and offering Amrut to people like the Guru. First, now do you know why talking disparagingly of Shivaji is a near-crime in Maharashtra? All the while we thought it is all plain necromancy. How could Laine get away with writing about Shivaji as if the Maratha king was a bastard?

The fact remains no one has the right to offend another's religious figure or leader. And look at the manufactured outrage over protest against Laine. And I don't see any secularist giving a lecture to the Sikhs or the Muslim on artistic freedom.

Coming back to the point of debate here, that is: is sex a bad thing after all? During my college days we boys went on a hike to Bhimashankar hills near Karjat, some 70 kms from Mumbai. The conversation, as always amongst college kids, veered around sex. One friend who had a carefully built athletic body told is about how sports medicine practitioners would insist on sexual abstinence to enhance performance on the field. Though media has always written against it that practice is still followed by sportsmen around the world during all major sports events, especially by the winning teams.

Recently there was this report on the link between oral sex and oral cancer which gained wide currency. The joke which also floated on millions of Orkut user sites was about Monica Lewenski saying, "oral cancer has many causes. It depends on what you smoke!" Read this BBC report: "writing in New Scientist magazine, US researchers said the human papilloma virus (HPV), which causes most cervical cancers, may also cause oral tumours. The HPV link could help explain why some young adults develop the disease. It is estimated that up to a fifth of women aged 18 to 22 in the UK carry a variety of HPV".

Only a decade ago the report on how kissing can exchange maximum number deadly bacteria took the world by storm. It was even reported that every kiss could shorten a man life span by about a few days. So if you calculate the number of times a man kisses in his life you could actually come to a conclusion that kissing could reduce his life span by a few years.

A few weeks ago in a Mumbai newspaper, a sexologist advised a girl to desist from anal sex as she had complained of anal 'leak'. According to the doctor, anal sex can damage the anal lining as well as the penal tissue permanently and both sex partners could suffer serious injuries to their private parts. He even gave an example of a patient who had to wear incontinence pads because of irreparable injury to her anus.

But the problem with the media the worldover is that freedom has become synonimous with unbridled sexual activity. This idea that you can have sex with anyone, anywhere, anytime in any position has become a measure to gauge a country's freedom. No one now-a-days talks of natural sex. Everyone talks of sex of a new kind. Sex may not be for procreation alone, it is recreation too. But to mislead people into believing that kinky sex is harmless is stretching things too far. In another blog we will discuss why sex should be only in traditional way, not kinky. Not even Kamasutra has prescribed anal sex, oral sex or kissing. Amen.

*******

Posted by Anil Nair at 8:15 AM
Sunday, 22 July 2007
In India customer is not the king, he is the courtesan
Mood:  vegas lucky
Now Playing: SHORT CHANGING CUSTOMERS IS CONSIDERED SMART
Topic: INDIANS HAVE MILES TO GO

One day I bought two Airtel refil cards for Rs 455 each. This is just about a year ago. In those days I had a prepaid number which was so easy to recharge and was hassale-free as their ad says. About four years ago I had an Orange post-paid number. There was nothing called customer service with Orange in those days. I wonder how much has it changed since it got converted to Hutch. I was rudely stopped from using Orange services one day because they would not recognise the fact that I had paid my bills to their designated bank -- Punjab National Bank near my house. Though, I had been paying my bills at that bank branch for years. Even when I had faxed them the bill copy I had paid, and even agreed to send them photo copies of the bills Orange service center man rudely told me that the connection will be cut within 24 hours if the Rs 2,600 bill was not paid again.

I didn't wait. I immediately got a prepaid Airtel card because I heard from many of my friends that the service provider gets less opportunity to fleece you than with a postpaid card where you are beholden to the service provider. I also somehow suspect that because I had a very sought-after, easy to memorise phone number Orange was keen to sell that number to someone who would pay them well for it.

Well, with the pre-paid Airtel number things did work out as easy as their ads claim. It was hassle-free inasmuch as using the phone. And I really didn't care if I was being overbilled because the monthly outgo was affordable to me. It never was Rs 2,600. When you don't have any human contact,  services in India always look good. Only when you have to deal with the service provider officials things go sour. And I realised that when I bought the two Rs 455 refil cards.

I had bought the cards from a small four square feet shop which sells CDs and wrist watches near Mulund station. I took the two cards home and tried to refil my phone charge. A 'network problem' message flashed persistently. Then I waited till the next day to check if the network had eased to help me recharge. But to no avail. Finally I called up the service call center for lodging a complaint. The lady at the other end without holding her breath told me there is congestion problems since last two days and it will be resolved in about 20 minutes.

I knew she was lying so I took a reference number for the complaint. Expectedly, two days later the problem had not resolved. So I called up again. This time it was a male on the other end. I narrated my saga to him. He again gave me the congestion fiddlesticks. I growled at him and I gave him my earlier complaint reference number. He put me on music for nearly 15 minutes and finally came back to tell me that there was a 'unique' problem. The two refil cards of Rs 455 are not valid on my phone as I was their most favoured lifetime customer! Strange but it is true, as Freddie Mercury said.

So what do I do now, I asked him. He politely told me to go the nearest Airtel service center and give back the cards for reimbursement. I loved that attitude. So I trooped to the service center near Mulund station next morning. The lady (I guess companies employ girls for their glorified indifference to customers) as usual gave me the you-stupid-jerk look while she explained that they are not mandated to make any reimbursements to customers and that the call center guy is unlikely to have said so. Which essentially meant that I was lying.

She suggested that I go back to the dealer from whom I bought the card for reimbursement. I thought that was a stupid idea. It was already three days since I bought the refil cards, so the dealer would have forgotten any such customer. I did not have any bill to prove that I bought the two cards from him. And I suspected even he does not know about Rs 455 refills not working in lifetime numbers. Well, in any event I thought I will give it a try.

The dealer was non-comittal and made all the appropriate sympathetic noises for me. His logic was that once the cards are scratched it is impossible to sell them to another customer. I thought selling the same cards to another customer, that too with numbers exposed, is sacrilege. I presumed the dealer could give the two cards back to the company as they we're still unused and Airtel could check their veracity. The exchanges between us after that point are unprintable.

So I went back to Airtel service center for an explanation. What really riled me up was the fact that the refil cards never mentioned that it was not valid for lifetime customers. I asked the girl at the service centre the same question. She only had a disdainful shrug. To prove her point she called up the call centre 9892098920. After she ascertained if it was the policy to reimburse the money from exposed  cards mistakenly sold to lifetime customers she gave me the phone. The girl at the other end exasperatedly told me: "how can you even think of reimbursement from an exposed card?!" Hmmm... I didn't have the heart to tell her I am the courtesan not the customer. 

**********


Posted by Anil Nair at 6:05 PM
Updated: Sunday, 22 July 2007 6:38 PM
Arrogance is machismo
Mood:  suave
Now Playing: Customers are courtesans in India
Topic: CUSTOMER RELATIONS
Have you ever realised why stress levels are high amongst us Indians? Because arrogance is macho in India. When I went to London for two weeks I never heard a single expletive in public place either in their conversation or while dealing with customers. They simply don't think rude behaviour as a sign of machismo.

Everyday, I am witness to ugly, intemperate exchanges between bus conductors and customers. And I keep asking myself:do the conductors have a right to shout at customers? Only yesterday I was witness to verbal duel between passengers, the bus conductor and a young boy who was late in reaching the door to get down from the bus. By the time the boy reached the doorway to alight at Churchgate station the crowd outside had barged in. After a scuffle and a few punches the boy finally managed to get down. First, I don't understand why bus conductors try to make the bus ride look like a 400 metre steeple chase. If the bus conductor and the driver are in such a hurry to reach their destination to keep to time why can't they start on time.

Also, if the people had been a little accommodating in letting the boy getting down there would have less stress, no bad blood and general cheer around. The conductor could have assured the boy that the bus would leave only after he gets down and he could have said that with a smile. That is the way it should be. But we Indians love to bring people down to their knees, we get sadistic pleasure in making others feel miserable and we love to misuse our position to throw our weight around. This, in spite of our bleating about great Indian culture, our family values, our manners in public places, calling elders with a Ji and all that bunkum. See the way bigger vehicles push around smaller vehicles on the road for no reason than arrogance.

I am struck by Indian insolence and could quote hundreds of examples. If you have not noticed this earlier it will surprise you that even in case of premium products like Rs 10+ lakh car,  foreign bank savings account or a BlackBerry, the official who is dealing with customers never knows the edict of customer relation that you are not supposed to shout at your customer, under ANY circumstances. Long ago when I was in school my aunt in the US told me that she, a front desk customer relations personnel, has standing orders not to even sound sarcastic when she is dealing with a customer who is lying. She was working for a small time insurance company. Why can't we Indians learn from the Americans, Japanese and the West Europeans.

The Indian culture which runs in our veins has taught us that arrogant behaviour is fashionable. We never learnt that customers have to be treated with respect, politely and as the raison d' eter of our business. We never learn to say please, thank you or sorry. While the westerners would not only say those words far too often but even earnestly feel for the customer.

Why do you need a Mahatma to tell you that customer is god, and he should be treated as god. I have seen that particular Gandhi's saying put up in many post offices. Is that not as plain as day.

Posted by Anil Nair at 5:58 PM
Updated: Sunday, 22 July 2007 6:54 PM

Newer | Latest | Older